In 2010, Daniel Tosh encouraged viewers of his show, Tosh.0, to visit the show's Wikipedia article and edit it at will. On a later episode, he commented on the edits to the article, most of them offensive, which h been me by the audience and h prompted the article to be locked from editing. Edit warring Wikipedians often have disputes regarding content, which may result in repeated competing changes to an article, kn as "edit warring". It is widely seen as a resource-consuming scenario w no useful kledge is ded, and criticized as creating a competitive and conflict-based editing culture associated with tritional masculine gender rolesContent in Wikipedia is subject to the laws (in particular, copyright laws) of the United States and of the US state of Virginia, w the majority of Wikipedia's servers are located. Beyond matters, the editorial principles of W ikipedia are embodied in the "five pillars" and in numerous policies and guidelines intended to appropriately shape content. Even these rules are stored in wiki , and Wikipedia editors write and revise the website's policies and guidelines. Editors can enforce these rules by deleting or modifying non-compliant material. Originally, rules on the non-English editions of Wikipedia were based on a translation of the rules for the English Wikipedia. They have since diverged to some extent. Content policies and guidelines According to the rules on the English Wikipedia, each entry in Wikipedia must be about a topic that is encyclopedic and is not a dictionary entry or dictionary-style. A topic should also meet Wikipedia's standards of "notability", which generally means that the topic must have been covered in mainstream media or major acemic journal sources that are independent of the article's subject. Further, Wikipedia intends to convey kledge that is a lrey established and recognized. It must not present original research. A claim that is likely to be challenged requires a reference to a reliable source. Among Wikipedia editors, this is often phrased as "verifiability, not truth" to express the idea that the reers, not the encyclopedia, are ultimately responsible for ing the truthfulness of the articles and making their own interpretations. This can at times le to the removal of ination that, though valid, is not properly sourced. Finally, Wikipedia must not take sides.Wikipedia's initial anarchy integrated democratic and hierarchical elements over time. An article is not considered to be owned by its creator or any other editor, nor by the subject of the article. ministrators Editors in good standing in the community can request extra user rights, granting them the technical ability to per certain special actions. In particular, editors can choose to run for "minship", which includes the ability to delete pages or prevent them from being changed in cases of severe vandalism or editorial disputes. ministrators are not supposed to enjoy any special privilege in decision-making; inste, their powers are mostly limited to making edits that have project-wide effects and thus are disallowed to ordinary editors, and to implement restrictions intended to prevent disruptive editors from making unproductive edits.