Just a handful of doctors knew this until recently: Every man over 40 suffering from prostate problems has this hidden toxin "leaking" inside their bodies... And not only does it swell the prostate, giving you the nagging sensation that you have to pee immediately... But could also lead to other incurable complications! Find out more here: How to avoid the dangerous "prostate toxin".                 Explicit content See also: Internet Watch Foundation and Wikipedia and Reporting of child pornography images on Wikimedia Commons "Wikipedia censorship" redirects . For the government censorship of Wikipedia, see Censorship of Wikipedia. For Wikipedia's policy concerning censorship, see Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not censored Wikipedia has been criticized for allog ination about graphic content. Articles depicting what some critics have ed objectionable content (such as feces, caver, human penis, vulva, and nudity) contain graphic pictures and detailed ination easily available to anyone with to the internet, including children. The site also includes sexual content such as images and videos of masturbation and ejaculation, illustrations of zoophilia, and photos from hardcore pornographic films in its articles. It also has non-sexual photographs of nude children. The Wikipedia article about Virgin Killer—a 1976 album from the German rock band Scorpions—features a picture of the album's original cover, which depicts a naked prepubescent girl. The original release cover caused controversy and was replaced in some countries. In December 2008, to the Wikipedia article Virgin Killer was blocked for four days by most Internet service providers in the United Kingdom after the Internet Watch Foundation (IWF) decided the album cover was a potentially il indecent image and ded the article's URL to a "blacklist" it supplies to British internet service providers. In April 2010, Sanger wrote a letter to the Federal Bureau of Investigation, outlining his concerns that two categories of images on Wikimedia Commons contained child pornography, and were in violation of US federal obscenity law. Sanger later clarified that the images, which were related to pedophilia and one abou t lolicon, were not of real children, but said that they constituted "obscene visual representations of the sexual abuse of children", under the PROTECT Act of 2003. That law bans photographic child pornography and cartoon images and drags of children that are obscene under American law. Sanger also expressed concerns about to the images on Wikipedia in schools. Wikimedia Foundation spokesman Jay Walsh strongly rejected Sanger's accusation, saying that Wikipedia did not have "material we would deem to be il. If we did, we would it." Follog the complaint by Sanger, Wales deleted sexual images without consulting the community. After some editors who volunteer to maintain the site argued that the decision to delete h been me hastily, Wales voluntarily gave up some of the powers he h held up to that time as part of his co-founder status. He wrote in a message to the Wikimedia Foundation mailing-list that this action was "in the interest of encouraging this d iscussion to be about real philosophical/content issues, rather than be about me and how quickly I acted". Critics, including Wikipediocracy, noticed that many of the pornographic images deleted from Wikipedia since 2010 have reappeared. Privacy One privacy concern in the case of Wikipedia is the right of a private citizen to remain a "private citizen" rather than a "public figure" in the eyes of the law.[note 6] It is a battle between the right to be anonymous in cyberspace and the right to be anonymous in real ("meatspace"). A particular occurs in the case of a relatively unimportant individual and for whom t exists a Wikipedia page against her or his wishes.