If you have problems viewing this email, click here.
Too much acid is not the problem! Yes it's true...Also...
It's not exactly too little acid either! I know weird, right? So what is the cause and...
 
So, why do doctors recommend medications like Zantac, Pepsid, or Prevacid? Well...
 
Whatever the reason doctors aren't talking about this, it's true:
   
Fortunately, there's a quick way to fix it...
   
Enjoy!
Austin
GET MORE HERE
 







To Stop Emails Visit here












 
In certain cases, all editors are allowed to submit modifications, but review is required for some editors, depending on certain conditions. For example, the German Wikipedia maintains "stable versions" of articles which have passed certain reviews. Follog protracted s and community discussion, the English Wikipedia introduced the "pending changes" system in December 2012. Under this system, new and unregistered users' edits to certain controversial or vandalism-prone articles are reviewed by established users before they are published.Although changes are not systematiy reviewed, the software that powers Wikipedia provides tools allog anyone to review changes me by others. Each article's History

page links to each revision.[note 4] On most articles, anyone can undo others' changes by ing a link on the article's History page. Anyone can view the latest changes to articles, and anyone registered may maintain a "watchlist" of articles that interest them so they can be notified of changes. "New pages patrol" is a process w newly created articles are ed for obvious s.

In 2003, economics Ph.D. student Andrea Ciffolilli argued that the low transaction s of participating in a wiki created a catalyst for collaborative development, and that features such as allog easy to past versions of a page favored "creative construction" over "creative destruction". Vandalism Main article: Vandalism on Wikipedia

Any change or edit that manipulates content in a way that purposefully compromises Wikipedia's integrity is considered vandalism. The most common and obvious types of vandalism include ditions of obscenities and crude humor; it can also include vertising and other types of spam. Sometimes editors commit vandalism by removing content or entirely blanking a given page. Less common types of vandalism, such as the deliberate dition of plausible but false ination, can be more difficult to detect. Vandals can introduce

irrelevant atting, modify page semantics such as the page's title or categorization, manipulate the article's underlying code, or use images disruptively. White-haired elderly gentleman in suit and tie speaks at a podium. American journalist John Seigenthaler (1927–2014), subject of the Seigenthaler incident.

Obvious vandalism is generally easy to from Wikipedia articles; the median time to detect and fix it is a few minutes. However, some vandalism takes much longer to detect and repair.

In the Seigenthaler biography incident, an anonymous editor introduced false ination into the biography of American political figure John Seigenthaler in May 2005, falsely presenting him as a suspect in the assassination of John F. Kennedy. It remained uncorrected for four months. Seigenthaler, the founding editorial director of USA Today and founder of the dom Forum First Amendment Center at Vanderbilt University, ed Wikipedia co-founder Jimmy Wales and asked whether he h any way of knog who contributed the misination. Wales said he did not, although the perpetrator was eventually traced. After the incident, Seigenthaler described Wikipedia as "a flawed and irresponsible research tool". The incident led to policy changes at Wikipedia for tightening up the verifiability of biographical articles of living people.