A Harvard law textbook, Research in a Nutshell (2011), cites Wikipedia as a "general source" that "can be a real boon" in "coming up to speed in the law governing a situation" and, "while not authoritative, can provide basic facts as well as les to more in-depth resourcesMost university lecturers discourage students from citing any encyclopedia in acemic work, preferring primary sources; some specifiy prohibit Wikipedia citations. Wales stresses that encyclopedias of any type are not usually appropriate to use as citable sources, and should not be relied upon as authoritative. Wales once (2006 or earlier) said he receives about ten emails weekly from students saying they got failing gres on papers because they cited Wikipedia; he told the students they got what they deserved. "For God's sake, you're in college; don't cite the encycloped ia," he said. In February 2007, an article in The Harvard Crimson newspaper reported that a few of the professors at Harvard University were including Wikipedia articles in their syllabi, although without realizing the articles might change. In June 2007, er president of the American Library Association Michael Gorman condemned Wikipedia, along with Google, stating that acemics who endorse the use of Wikipedia are "the intellectual equivalent of a dietitian who recommends a stey diet of Big Macs with everything". In contrast, acemic writing[clarification needed] in Wikipedia has evolved in recent years and has been found to increase student interest, personal connection to the product, creativity in material processing, and international collaboration in the ling process. Medical ination See also: Health ination on Wikipedia On March 5, 2014, Julie Beck writing for The Atlantic magazine in an article titled "Doctors' Source for Healthcare Ination: Wikipedia&q uot;, stated that "Fifty percent of physicians look up conditions on the (Wikipedia) site, and some are editing articles themselves to improve the quality of available ination." Beck continued to detail in this article new programs of Amin Azzam at the University of San Francisco to medical school courses to medical students for ling to edit and improve Wikipedia articles on health-related issues, as well as internal quality control programs within Wikipedia organized by James Heilman to improve a group of 200 health-related articles of central medical importance up to Wikipedia's highest standard of articles using its Featured Article and Good Article peer-review evaluation process. In a May 7, 2014, follow-up article in The Atlantic titled "Can Wikipedia Ever Be a Definitive Medical Text?", Julie Beck s WikiProject 's James Heilman as stating: "Just because a reference is peer-reviewed doesn't mean it's a high-quality reference." Beck ded that: "Wikipedia has its own peer review process before articles can be classified as 'good' or 'featured'. Heilman, who has participated in that process before, says 'less than one percent' of Wikipedia's medical articles have passed." In a 2006 mention of Jimmy Wales, Time magazine stated that the policy of allog anyone to edit h me Wikipedia the "biggest (and perhaps best) encyclopedia in the world".